Joule–Thomson Effects on the Flow of Liquid Water

Wepresent a revised formof the energy balance for the coupled thermodynamics of liquid water flowing in porousmedia and give examples of situations where a commonly used formulation based on transport of enthalpy leads to erroneous results. Assuming negligible contribution from kinetic energy as well as sources and sinks such as energy from radioactive decay, total energy conservation is reduced to a balance between changes in internal energy, enthalpy, conductive heat flux, and gravitational potential energy. The Joule–Thomson coefficient is defined as the change in temperature with respect to an increase in pressure at constant enthalpy. Because liquid water has a negative Joule–Thomson coefficient at low temperatures, at a constant gravitational potential water cools as it compresses and heats as it expands. If one ignores the gravitational energy, transport of enthalpy alone leads to water heating by 2◦C per kilometer as it is brought up from depth. The corrected energy balance transports methalpy, which is enthalpy plus gravitational potential energy. Although the simpler form leads to small changes in the temperature profile for typical simulations, there are several instances where this effect may prove to be important. The most important impact of the erroneous form is probably in the field of geothermal energy production, where the creation of a few degrees of heat in a simulation could lead to miscalculation of power plant efficiencies.